TSER, not IR rejection percentages, decides real cooling performance
Singapore sits almost directly on the equator. Unlike countries with seasonal variation, solar radiation remains intense throughout the year.
When sunlight strikes glass, energy enters in three forms:
• Ultraviolet radiation (UV)
• Visible light
• Infrared radiation (IR)
Infrared radiation accounts for a substantial portion of the heat you feel near a window. Once this solar energy enters the room, it is absorbed by flooring, furniture, walls, and interior surfaces, which then release heat back into the living space.
This is why a west-facing living room often remains warm long after the sun has moved away.
The purpose of solar control window film is not simply to darken glass. Its primary function is to reduce the amount of solar energy entering the building envelope in the first place.
Many homeowners are shown demonstrations claiming:
• 95% IR rejection
• 97% IR rejection
• 99% IR rejection
These figures often measure only a narrow portion of the infrared spectrum and do not represent total heat rejection.
Professional consultants evaluate performance using TSER (Total Solar Energy Rejected).
TSER measures the percentage of the sun’s total energy that a film prevents from entering the building.
This includes:
• Ultraviolet energy
• Visible light energy
• Infrared energy
A film with a higher TSER generally delivers greater real-world cooling performance than a film that merely advertises a high infrared rejection figure.
This is why architects, façade consultants, and building engineers rely on TSER rather than marketing IR numbers.
Sputtered films are produced using high-vacuum magnetron sputtering technology.
During manufacturing, microscopic metallic layers are deposited onto polyester film using controlled particle bombardment. The result is an exceptionally uniform coating structure capable of selectively reflecting solar energy.
Rather than absorbing large amounts of heat, sputtered films reject a significant portion of solar energy by reflecting it away from the glass.
Because less energy is absorbed into the film itself, the glass system generally operates at a lower temperature during prolonged sun exposure.
Modern premium sputtered films utilise multiple metallic and dielectric layers engineered to target different portions of the solar spectrum while maintaining optical clarity.
Examples include advanced architectural films such as LLumar’s sputtered and dual-reflective series.
Nano ceramic films use microscopic ceramic particles embedded within the film structure.
These particles interact with infrared wavelengths through a combination of absorption, scattering, and selective reflection. Unlike metallic films, ceramic films contain no metal layers.
As a result, they typically:
• Do not cause measurable interference with WiFi
• Do not affect cellular reception
• Do not affect GPS signals
• Maintain a neutral external appearance
This makes nano ceramic films particularly attractive for homeowners seeking a low-reflectivity appearance while still achieving meaningful solar heat reduction. Modern premium ceramic films have improved dramatically over the past decade and can deliver impressive thermal performance when properly engineered
At comparable visible light transmission levels, sputtered multi-layer films generally achieve higher TSER values than ceramic films.
This is because reflected solar energy never enters the glass system in the first place. Ceramic films can still achieve excellent performance, particularly in premium product categories, but the highest TSER figures are typically achieved by advanced sputtered technologies.
The difference becomes most noticeable on:
• West-facing condominium units
• Floor-to-ceiling glazing
• Landed homes with large glass openings
• Rooms exposed to direct afternoon sun for several hours daily
Under these conditions, maximum TSER often becomes the deciding factor.
Most window film failures are not caused by the coating. They are caused by the adhesive.
The adhesive layer is responsible for maintaining long-term optical clarity and bonding the film to the glass under years of heat, humidity, and ultraviolet exposure.
When adhesive systems fail, homeowners may experience:
• Bubbling
• Edge lifting
• Distortion
• Haze
• Delamination
Singapore’s tropical climate accelerates these stresses.
This is one reason why two films with seemingly similar specifications can perform very differently after five or ten years of service.
The long-term durability of a window film depends not only on the coating technology but also on the quality of the adhesive system, manufacturing consistency, and installation standards.
Maximum Heat Rejection
Recommended: Sputtered Multi-Layer Film
Best suited for homeowners seeking the highest possible TSER and strongest reduction in solar heat gain.
West-Facing HDB or Condominium
Recommended: Sputtered Multi-Layer Film
Particularly effective where direct afternoon sun creates sustained heat build-up.
Strict MCST Appearance Requirements
Recommended: Nano Ceramic Film
Suitable where external reflectivity must be minimised.
Strong WiFi and Wireless Requirements
Recommended: Nano Ceramic Film
Non-metallic construction avoids potential signal attenuation associated with metallic coatings.
Floor-to-Ceiling Glass Facades
Recommended: Sputtered Multi-Layer Film
Often provides superior thermal performance at comparable visible light levels.
Sea-Facing Properties
Recommended: Corrosion-Resistant Sputtered Film or Marine-Grade Solar Film
The film must be specifically designed for high-humidity and coastal environments.
The highest-performing film is not automatically the right film. Glass type matters.
Before recommending any solar film, a professional consultant should evaluate:
• Glass thickness
• Annealed or tempered construction
• Laminated glass configuration
• Double-glazed units (IGUs)
• Existing Low-E coatings
• Solar orientation
Applying an incompatible film can increase thermal stress and potentially contribute to glass breakage. Professional assessment eliminates this risk before installation.
_______
No. Both technologies have strengths. Ceramic films offer a non-metallic construction and low reflectivity, while sputtered films typically achieve higher TSER values at comparable visible light levels
TSER is generally the more meaningful indicator because it measures the rejection of total solar energy rather than a narrow portion of the infrared spectrum.
Some metallic films can attenuate wireless signals. The degree varies depending on film construction and signal frequency.
For prolonged afternoon sun exposure, high-TSER sputtered films typically deliver the strongest thermal performance.
Improper film selection can increase thermal stress. This is why glass compatibility assessment is essential before installation.
Premium architectural films professionally installed on compatible glass commonly carry manufacturer warranties ranging from ten to fifteen years, depending on the product and application.
Our Location:
Opening Hours:
The Leading Provider of Window Films & Blinds in Singapore Since 1999
© Copyright 2026 windowcool.com